Speaking Feedback Date : 2016/06/11 Speaker: Eunsol Lee Evaluator: choi ji yun Title : Process of being an UNESCO's world cultural heritage
1. What strong points does the speaker have? Her well organized ppt was her stong point because that process could be hard to understand a little. With her nice ppt it was easy to understand
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? I was one of the audience and we understood very well because her nice ppt and her expalanation helped to get to know well.
3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
Yes she did. She memorized all text
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
Yes. Her voice is clear and easy to understand
5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
Yes.
6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact. Her eyes contact with camera and ppt. It would be more nicer if she do eye contact with audiences.
7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech? If she do more eye contact with audience it will be really good. 8. What did you like about the presentation? I really like her clear voice and well organized ppt.
Date: June 17th Speaker: Lee Eunsol Evaluator: Song Jiyeon Title: Process as UNESCO's world cultural heritage
1. What strong points does the speaker haver? Her ppt with appropriate amount of information. There wasn't too much or too little for better understanding.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? The audience got to know the process to become UNESCO's world cultural heritage in details.
3.Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? Yes. There were parepared ppt and needed information. Also, she relied only on her memory.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? Yes. It was very clear and audible.
5. Did the speech have definite opening body and conclusion? Yes. She talked about how she chose this topic and why in intro, details in middle, and her thoughts and conclusion in the end.
6. Please comment on the speaker's use of notes and eye contact. There weren't use of notes except for some informaiton on ppt, and there were eye contacts.
7. What could the speaker have done differnetly that would have improved the speech? I think it was a really good speech. Relying just on memory is hard, even though she did it really well. But there were some moments where it went bit less smoothly and maybe it could be improved.
8. What did you like about the presentation? I liked her volume of the voice. It was really loud and clear. I also liked her example of Kyung ju because I agree on what she said. :):)
Date: June 19th Speaker: Lee Eunsol Evaluator: Lee Eunsol Title: Process as UNESCO's world cultural heritage
1. What strong points does the speaker haver? - I think I made my presentation in a strong and clear way because I tried to convey objective informations with visual aids.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? - I believe I got quite great communication with the audience.
3.Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? - Yes.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? - Yes.
5. Did the speech have definite opening body and conclusion? - Yes. I talked about how I chose this topic and why as an intro, then my thoughts and conclusion in the end.
6. Please comment on the speaker's use of notes and eye contact. - There weren't use of notes except for some informaiton on ppt. Good eye-contact.
7. What could the speaker have done differnetly that would have improved the speech? -I think if I had more allowed time, it would be better memorizing and then making the script into my own words smoothly.
8. What did you liked about the presentation? - Clear speaking and confident attitude.
Speaking Feedback
ReplyDeleteDate : 2016/06/11
Speaker: Eunsol Lee
Evaluator: choi ji yun
Title : Process of being an UNESCO's world cultural heritage
1. What strong points does the speaker have? Her well organized ppt was her stong point because that process could be hard to understand a little. With her nice ppt it was easy to understand
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
I was one of the audience and we understood very well because her nice ppt and her expalanation helped to get to know well.
3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
Yes she did. She memorized all text
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
Yes. Her voice is clear and easy to understand
5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
Yes.
6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
Her eyes contact with camera and ppt. It would be more nicer if she do eye contact with audiences.
7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
If she do more eye contact with audience it will be really good.
8. What did you like about the presentation?
I really like her clear voice and well organized ppt.
Date: June 17th
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Lee Eunsol
Evaluator: Song Jiyeon
Title: Process as UNESCO's world cultural heritage
1. What strong points does the speaker haver?
Her ppt with appropriate amount of information. There wasn't too much or too little for better understanding.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
The audience got to know the process to become UNESCO's world cultural heritage in details.
3.Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
Yes. There were parepared ppt and needed information. Also, she relied only on her memory.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
Yes. It was very clear and audible.
5. Did the speech have definite opening body and conclusion?
Yes. She talked about how she chose this topic and why in intro, details in middle, and her thoughts and conclusion in the end.
6. Please comment on the speaker's use of notes and eye contact.
There weren't use of notes except for some informaiton on ppt, and there were eye contacts.
7. What could the speaker have done differnetly that would have improved the speech?
I think it was a really good speech. Relying just on memory is hard, even though she did it really well. But there were some moments where it went bit less smoothly and maybe it could be improved.
8. What did you like about the presentation?
I liked her volume of the voice. It was really loud and clear. I also liked her example of Kyung ju because I agree on what she said. :):)
Date: June 19th
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Lee Eunsol
Evaluator: Lee Eunsol
Title: Process as UNESCO's world cultural heritage
1. What strong points does the speaker haver?
- I think I made my presentation in a strong and clear way because I tried to convey objective informations with visual aids.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
- I believe I got quite great communication with the audience.
3.Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
- Yes.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
- Yes.
5. Did the speech have definite opening body and conclusion?
- Yes. I talked about how I chose this topic and why as an intro, then my thoughts and conclusion in the end.
6. Please comment on the speaker's use of notes and eye contact.
- There weren't use of notes except for some informaiton on ppt. Good eye-contact.
7. What could the speaker have done differnetly that would have improved the speech?
-I think if I had more allowed time, it would be better memorizing and then making the script into my own words smoothly.
8. What did you liked about the presentation?
- Clear speaking and confident attitude.